Gridbots Sentinel layered anti drone system — RF, electro-optical and acoustic sensing with KATANA hard-kill effector
3KMRF Detection Layer
1.5KMOptical Confirmation
800MAcoustic Terminal Layer
1KMKinetic Engagement
§ 01 · System Concept

ANTI DRONE SYSTEM — A DEFENCE THAT DOES NOT BLINK

Three-Layer Detection · One Kinetic Effector · Sense · Confirm · Defeat

Every counter-drone system fails the same way: it relies on a single physical principle, and the adversary learns to defeat that principle. Radio-silent drones defeat RF. Night, haze and low contrast defeat optics. Terrain masking and clutter defeat radar at low altitude.

Gridbots Sentinel is built on the opposite premise. Three unrelated sensing domains — radio-frequency, electro-optical and acoustic — are stacked as overlapping shells around the protected asset. A threat that suppresses one layer walks directly into the next, and the handover between layers is continuous: there is no range at which the target is unobserved.

Detection alone is not defence. The fused track is passed as a slew-to-cue command to KATANA, the Gridbots stabilised remote weapon station, which acquires the target on its own EO/IR tracker, computes a lead-compensated firing solution and defeats it with a short, disciplined burst.

The complete sensing stack mounts on a single compact mast. The effector mounts alongside it, on the same vehicle, or on a separate node in a meshed network.

Design Principles

Physics diversity over sensor count. Three different laws of physics, not three cameras.
Continuous handover. Layer coverage overlaps deliberately — no dead band between shells.
Passive-first. The outer two layers emit nothing, leaving no signature for an adversary to home on.
Edge autonomy. Classification and cueing run on-mast. The system fights through a comms blackout.
One mast, one crew. Sensor stack, compute and effector interface deploy as a single logistical unit.
Indigenous. Designed, built and supported in India end to end.
Gridbots Sentinel counter drone system showing Terawave RF aperture, Sleuthound optical head, BAT-M acoustic array and KATANA remote weapon station on a single mast
Fusion Core & Operator Console
KATANA RCWS
BAT-M Acoustic Array
Sleuthound Optical Head
Terawave RF Aperture
3000 m · RF 1500 m · EO/IR 1000 m · KINETIC 800 m · ACOUSTIC PROTECTED ASSET FIG. 01 · SCHEMATIC · NOT TO SCALE
§ 02 · Coverage Analysis

THE DETECTION CONTINUUM

Where one layer's confidence decays, the next is already rising. The handover is engineered, not incidental — every layer reaches at least 20% beyond the point at which the next achieves reliable declaration.

Terawave · passive RF, coherent bearing3000–800 m
Sleuthound · NIR / SWIR / MWIR optical ID1500–800 m
BAT-M · acoustic rotor harmonic800–100 m
KATANA · kinetic engagement envelope1000 m
Fused track file · one contact identityLIVE

Fig. 02 · Layer coverage & handover envelope

Layer coverage and handover envelope chart showing Terawave RF, Sleuthound optical, BAT-M acoustic and KATANA engagement bands against slant range

Fig. 03 · Track confidence vs range

Track confidence versus range curve showing RF, EO/IR and acoustic contributions combining into a fused track

Why three layers

Adversary countermeasureLayer that still sees it
Fibre-optic tethered FPV (zero RF emission)EO/IR + Acoustic
Pre-programmed autonomous waypoint flightEO/IR + Acoustic
Night, haze, low contrast, smoke obscurationRF + Acoustic
Frequency hopping / encrypted datalinkRF (wideband) + EO/IR
Terrain-masked nap-of-the-earth ingressAcoustic + EO/IR
Glide / motors-off terminal approachEO/IR

Engineered overlap. Each layer is specified to reach at least 20% beyond the point at which the next layer achieves reliable declaration. This deliberate redundancy is what allows Sentinel to hold a continuous track file on a target that is actively trying to break lock — and it is the reason a single-sensor countermeasure does not produce a gap in coverage.

§ 03–05 · Sensing Stack

THREE INDEPENDENT SENSING DOMAINS

Gridbots Terawave wideband passive RF drone detector with coherent direction finding Diagram of coherent direction finding resolving drone bearing from the received wavefront
Layer 01 · Radio-Frequency Domain

GRIDBOTS TERAWAVE

Passive · Non-emitting · 360° · Outer shell, first cue

Wideband passive RF detector with coherent direction finding — the outermost shell, and the only layer that can locate the operator as well as the aircraft. Terawave listens. It never transmits, so it presents no emission for an adversary to detect, geolocate or home upon: a decisive advantage over radar-first architectures in contested electromagnetic environments.

The unit continuously sweeps a wide swathe of the spectrum for the characteristic signatures of unmanned aircraft: command uplinks, video downlinks, telemetry bursts and the timing structure of frequency-hopping control protocols. Signal classification runs against a maintained library of commercial, modified and military UAS emitters, and the library is field-updatable without factory return.

Coherent direction finding is what separates Terawave from simple spectrum alarms. The receiver chain preserves phase coherence across its aperture and resolves the bearing of the emitter directly from the wavefront — a true angular fix delivered within the first seconds of emission, not a proximity estimate derived from signal strength. That bearing is handed instantly to Layer 02, which slews to the indicated sector and begins optical search in a narrow arc rather than across the whole sky, collapsing acquisition time by an order of magnitude.

T-01
WIDEBAND SPECTRUM WATCH
Continuous surveillance across the bands used by commercial, modified and military UAS control and video links, including hopping protocols.
T-02
COHERENT DIRECTION FINDING
Phase-preserving receive chain resolves emitter bearing from the wavefront itself — a genuine angular fix, not an RSSI proximity guess.
T-03
OPERATOR LOCALISATION
Uplink and downlink are separated, allowing the ground control station to be bearing-fixed alongside the aircraft for interdiction.
T-04
ZERO EMISSION FOOTPRINT
Fully passive operation. Nothing radiates, so the site cannot be located, jammed or targeted through its own sensor.
Layer roleOuter Shell · First Cue
Detection envelope2–3 km Nominal
Operating modeFully Passive
Azimuth coverage360° Continuous
Localisation methodCoherent Bearing
OutputSlew-to-Cue Sector
Gridbots Sleuthound rotating multispectral NIR SWIR MWIR optical drone detector Gridbots Sleuthound-STAB fibre-optic gyro stabilised electro-optical payload
Layer 02 · Electro-Optical Domain

GRIDBOTS SLEUTHOUND

NIR · SWIR · MWIR · On-board GPU · Optical identification

A continuously rotating multispectral scanner that turns the whole sky into a single refreshed image — and tells you what is actually flying in it. Sleuthound rotates without pause, building a complete hemispherical picture and refreshing it once per second. Nothing enters the volume unobserved, whether or not it is transmitting.

Three optical bands are carried on one head. NIR gives fine spatial detail and reads airframe geometry in daylight and starlight. SWIR cuts through haze, dust and thin smoke where visible imaging collapses, and remains effective in the difficult twilight bands. MWIR reads emitted heat, exposing motor and battery signatures against a cold sky at night and through obscurants entirely.

A drone that hides in one band is exposed in another. Fusing all three at the pixel level yields a signature far harder to defeat than any single-band imager, and provides the classification confidence needed to authorise a kinetic response. An on-board GPU performs detection, classification and angular localisation at the head — no video is shipped to a rear workstation and no decision waits on a network. Sleuthound resolves what a track actually is: rotary-wing UAS, fixed-wing UAS, bird, or manned aircraft.

Fig. 04 · Multispectral band complementarity

BandPrimary contributionDaylightNightHaze / dust / smoke
NIRAirframe geometry, rotor form, fine detailExcellentModerateLimited
SWIRObscurant penetration, twilight continuityExcellentStrongExcellent
MWIRMotor / battery thermal signature, cold-sky contrastModerateExcellentStrong
FUSEDCombined signature — classification & declarationExcellentExcellentExcellent
S-01
PERSISTENT FULL-SKY SCAN
Uninterrupted rotation with a one-hertz refresh of the entire hemisphere. Search is continuous, not directed.
S-02
TRI-BAND FUSION
NIR, SWIR and MWIR combined on a common head so no single atmospheric or lighting condition blinds the layer.
S-03
EDGE CLASSIFICATION
On-board GPU inference separates UAS from birds and manned aircraft locally, at the head, in real time.
S-04
RF-INDEPENDENT DETECTION
Sees fibre-optic, autonomous and radio-silent drones that no RF-based layer can register at all.
Layer roleIdentification & Declaration
Detection envelope1.5 km Nominal
Sensing bandsNIR · SWIR · MWIR
Full-sky refresh1 Hz Continuous
ProcessingOn-Board GPU · At the Head
OutputClassified Optical Track
Gridbots BAT-M passive acoustic drone detection array Diagram of rotor harmonic bearing extraction across a calibrated three dimensional microphone array
Layer 03 · Acoustic Domain

GRIDBOTS BAT-M

Passive acoustic array · Real-time bearing · Terminal confirmation

The terminal layer. When a drone is close enough to matter, it is close enough to hear — and sound cannot be made stealthy. Inside 800 metres a multirotor is loud, and its noise is structured. Rotor blade passage produces a distinctive harmonic signature that no operator can suppress: the drone must move air to stay airborne, and moving air makes sound.

BAT-M derives from the combat-proven Gridbots BAT acoustic locator family, re-tuned from supersonic muzzle events to the low-frequency rotor domain. A calibrated three-dimensional microphone array samples the acoustic field continuously; digital signal processing extracts the rotor harmonic set from ambient clutter and resolves the source direction from the differential arrival of the wavefront across the array.

Because it is entirely passive and physically independent of both the electromagnetic and optical domains, BAT-M is immune to jamming, to RF silence, to darkness and to visual obscuration alike. It is the layer that holds the track when everything else has been degraded — and it covers precisely the band in which terminal engagement occurs, providing an independent, physics-diverse confirmation of a hostile track at the single most valuable moment in the engagement to have a second opinion.

B-01
ROTOR SIGNATURE EXTRACTION
DSP isolates the blade-pass harmonic structure of a multirotor from wind, traffic and battlefield background noise.
B-02
REAL-TIME BEARING
Differential wavefront arrival across a calibrated 3D array yields a continuous directional solution as the target closes.
B-03
UNJAMMABLE BY CONSTRUCTION
Acoustic propagation lies outside the electromagnetic spectrum entirely. No EW technique degrades this layer.
B-04
TERMINAL CONFIRMATION
Independent third-domain verification inside the weapon envelope, at the moment fire authorisation is required.
Layer roleTerminal Confirmation
Localisation band800 m – 100 m
Sensing domainAcoustic · Passive
Azimuth coverage360° Continuous
Solution typeReal-Time Bearing
EW vulnerabilityNone · Non-EM Domain
§ 06 · Effector · Kinetic Domain

GRIDBOTS KATANA

The sensing stack exists to deliver a cue · KATANA exists to make that cue final

Gridbots KATANA stabilised remote weapon station with 7.62 mm medium machine gun in the air defence role Lead-compensated ballistics diagram showing predicted intercept point against a manoeuvring aerial target

KATANA is among the most precise remote weapon stations built in India, proven on armoured platforms and at high-altitude forward posts. In the Sentinel architecture it is configured for the air-defence role with a 7.62 mm medium machine gun.

KATANA does not depend on the sensing stack to shoot. It carries its own real-time EO/IR tracker, so the cue from Layers 01–03 is only a starting bearing: the station slews onto the indicated sector, acquires the target independently on its own optics and locks. From that moment the firing solution is generated from the weapon's own line of sight, eliminating the parallax and latency errors that afflict systems slaved to a remote sensor.

Stabilisation holds the sight line steady against vehicle motion, wind loading and recoil, which makes engagement from a moving platform practical rather than theoretical. The ballistic solver continuously computes lead against the target's measured velocity vector so that rounds and drone arrive at the same point in space.

Engagement is deliberately economical: a controlled burst of four to five rounds, then reassess. Against a swarm this discipline is decisive — the prioritisation engine re-slews to the next-highest-threat track in under a second and repeats, sustaining a high engagement rate on a modest ammunition load.

K-01
INDEPENDENT EO/IR TRACKER
Own-sight acquisition and lock after cue. Firing solution derives from the weapon line, not a remote sensor.
K-02
STABILISED LINE OF SIGHT
Holds aim through platform motion, wind and recoil — shoot-on-the-move against a manoeuvring aerial target.
K-03
LEAD-COMPENSATED BALLISTICS
Continuous solver places the burst at the predicted intercept point rather than the observed position.
K-04
SWARM RE-ENGAGEMENT
Prioritised target queue with sub-second re-slew, sustaining engagement tempo across successive contacts.
7.62MMMedium Machine Gun
4–5RDBurst Per Engagement
1KMEngagement Envelope
360°Azimuth Traverse
3-AXISStabilisation
<1SRe-Slew To Next Track
§ 07 · Engagement Sequence

SENSE · CONFIRM · DEFEAT

One track file, three sensing domains, one effector

The handovers are automatic; the authority is yours.

Fig. 05 · Fused cueing chain

Fused cueing chain diagram: Terawave, Sleuthound and BAT-M feeding the fusion core, then slew-to-cue to KATANA RCWS with operator and C2 authorisation

ONE TRACK FILE, NOT THREE ALARMS

The failure mode of multi-sensor counter-UAS systems is not blindness — it is noise. Three sensors reporting the same drone as three separate contacts is worse than one sensor reporting it correctly, because the operator must now resolve the ambiguity under time pressure.

The Sentinel fusion core associates detections across all three domains into a single track file before anything reaches the operator's screen. A drone detected on RF at 2,400 m, identified optically at 1,300 m and confirmed acoustically at 700 m appears throughout as one continuous track with a rising confidence value — never as a new contact.

CROSS-DOMAIN CORROBORATION

Fusion also supplies something no single sensor can: independent corroboration. A track carried by two or three unrelated physics is qualitatively stronger evidence than a track carried by one, however good that one may be. Sentinel presents a corroboration state with every track — which domains currently hold it, and with what agreement — so that the decision to fire rests on visible, auditable evidence rather than on an opaque confidence percentage.

Engagement timeline · Nominal

RF declarationT+0
Optical slewT+0.3 s
ClassificationT+0.6 s
Acoustic confirmationT+0.9 s
RCWS lockT+1.2 s
AuthorisationT+1.5 s
BurstT+2.0 s

KATANA engagement sequence

01 · Slew to cued sector
02 · Own EO/IR acquire
03 · Lock & track
04 · Ballistic lead solution
05 · 4–5 round burst
06 · Assess & re-engage

Battle damage assessment feeds the track file and re-cues automatically if the target survives.

§ 08 · Threat Environment

THREAT COVERAGE MATRIX

Which layer holds the track, against which class of threat

Threat class Terawave · RF Sleuthound · EO/IR BAT-M · Acoustic Sentinel response
Commercial quadcopterCOTS, radio-controlled ● Primary● Primary● Primary Detected at maximum range on emission; identified and defeated well outside the protected perimeter.
Fibre-optic FPVzero RF emission ○ Blind● Primary● Primary The threat class that defeats RF-only systems outright. Optical scan and acoustic array carry the full engagement.
Autonomous waypoint UASpre-programmed, no link ○ Blind● Primary● Primary No datalink to detect or jam. Sentinel engages on optical signature and rotor acoustics alone.
Night / obscured ingressdarkness, haze, smoke, dust ● Primary● SWIR / MWIR● Primary SWIR penetrates obscurants; MWIR reads thermal signature against cold sky. The acoustic layer is condition-independent.
Coordinated swarmsaturation from multiple vectors ● Primary● Primary◑ Terminal Full-sky 1 Hz scan holds all contacts simultaneously; the prioritisation engine sequences KATANA by threat value.
Weaponised payload UASmunition or dispersant carrier ● Primary● Primary● Primary Layered detection establishes a defended standoff so that engagement occurs before release altitude is reached.
ISR / surveillance dronepersistent standoff observation ● Primary● Primary○ Out of band Downlink bearing exposes both aircraft and ground control station; operator position is passed for interdiction.
EW / jammer-carrying UASspectrum-denial payload ◑ Degraded● Primary● Primary Jamming does not touch the optical or acoustic domains. Sentinel continues to track and engage through EM denial.
Low, terrain-masked ingressnap-of-the-earth approach ● Primary◑ Line of sight● Primary The profile that defeats radar horizon. RF and acoustic detection are unaffected by the absence of a clean skyline.

● Primary — layer carries the track  ·  ◑ Partial / terminal — contributes within a limited band  ·  ○ Blind — no contribution from this domain

Fig. 06 · Architectural comparison

CapabilityGridbots SentinelRF-only detectorRadar + jammer
Independent sensing domainsThreeOneTwo (both EM)
Detects radio-silent drones Yes No Radar only
Operates through EW / jamming Yes No No
Emission footprintPassive layersPassiveActively radiates
Bird / aircraft discrimination Multispectral None Doppler only
Integral hard-kill KATANA None Soft-kill only
Terminal-phase confirmation Acoustic None None
Operator localisation Coherent bearing RSSI estimate None
Indigenous design & support 100% India Varies Varies
§ 09 · Physical Configuration

ONE MAST. ONE CREW.

The entire sensing stack is a single logistical object — erected, levelled and self-calibrating in minutes

STACK ARCHITECTURE

All three sensing layers occupy a single compact mast, ordered so that each has the field of view its physics requires: the acoustic array uppermost and clear of ground reflection, the RF aperture beneath it with an unobstructed horizon, and the optical head at the level that gives the cleanest sky-line for its rotation.

Fusion compute and power conditioning sit in the base, keeping mass low and the mast slender. A single cable run carries data and power up the mast, so field replacement of any one sensor is a bolt-and-connector operation rather than a depot task.

KATANA mounts alongside the mast on the same platform, or on a separate node entirely — the cue is data, not a mechanical linkage, so sensing and effect can be physically separated where the tactical situation demands it.

Deployment time15–20 Minutes
Crew requirementTwo Persons
CalibrationAutomatic at Boot
Sensor servicingField Hot-Swap
Effector placementCo-Sited or Remote
Network topologySingle or Meshed
Gridbots Sentinel anti drone system mast mounted on a light 4x4 vehicle in desert terrain
§ 09.1 · Deployment Profiles
FORWARD MILITARY POST
FOB and forward-post overwatch, convoy halt protection and high-altitude picket in contested airspace.
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Refineries, power generation, nuclear facilities, dams, ports and strategic industrial estates.
AIRFIELD PERIMETER
Civil and military aerodrome airspace protection, with manned-aircraft discrimination built in.
BORDER SURVEILLANCE
Meshed multi-node deployment across infiltration and contraband corridors, day and night.
NAVAL & COASTAL
Shipborne and littoral installations in a maritime-hardened configuration.
URBAN SECURITY
Metropolitan critical zones, stadium protection and smart-city surveillance integration.
VIP & EVENT AIRSPACE
State visits, summits, ceremonies and mass gatherings under restrictive rules of engagement.
VEHICLE MOUNTED
Light 4×4 through heavy truck chassis, with stabilised shoot-on-the-move capability.
§ 10 · Engagement Control

HUMAN AUTHORITY

Three control configurations · In every one of them the audit trail is complete

Mode 01 · Manual
FULL MANUAL CONTROL

The operator retains complete authority over every engagement decision. Sentinel presents the fused track picture, the corroboration state and a targeting recommendation — and takes no autonomous action whatsoever. Intended for peacetime deployments, mixed civil airspace and ROE-sensitive environments.

  • Operator authorises every engagement
  • System provides cues and solutions only
  • Dual-confirmation workflow enforced
  • Complete action-level audit log
Mode 02 · Assisted
OPERATOR-ASSISTED

Detection, classification, track fusion and slew-to-cue proceed autonomously. A complete firing solution is prepared and presented for single-action authorisation. Response time collapses to seconds while human judgement remains in the loop on every kinetic effect.

  • Autonomous detection, fusion and tracking
  • Prepared engagement solution presented
  • Single-action operator authorisation
  • Sub-two-second cue-to-fire readiness
Mode 03 · Autonomous
FULL AUTONOMOUS

Within a pre-authorised rule set and a geofenced engagement volume, Sentinel detects, classifies, prioritises and neutralises without operator intervention. Reserved for saturation scenarios in which threat tempo exceeds the human decision loop. Operator override is available at all times.

  • Full engagement cycle autonomous
  • Configurable ROE rule set
  • Geofenced engagement volume
  • Swarm prioritisation and re-engagement

COMMAND & CONTROL INTEGRATION

Sentinel is designed to be a sensor and effector node within a larger air-defence picture, not a closed island. Fused track data, engagement logs, classification imagery and system health telemetry are published over standard military datalinks to any compatible C2 node.

Equally important is what happens when that link fails. All classification, fusion and cueing execute on-mast, so a comms-denied Sentinel node continues to detect, decide and — within its authorised rule set — engage. Nothing in the kill chain requires a round trip to a rear headquarters.

ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY

After every burst the EO/IR tracker performs visual assessment and the result is written to the track file. If the target persists, the prioritisation engine re-cues automatically.

Every engagement is recorded in full: sensor corroboration state at the time of authorisation, the identity of the authorising operator, the firing solution, imagery before and after, and grid coordinates — a complete evidentiary record for post-action review, inquiry or prosecution.

3Control Modes
<2SCue To Fire Readiness
1HZFull-Sky Refresh
100%Engagements Logged
24HRAutonomous Endurance
360°Continuous Coverage
Technical Data

SPECIFICATIONS

SYSTEM

Model seriesGRIDBOTS SENTINEL
ArchitectureLayered and distributed — three sensing domains, one effector
Sensing physicsElectromagnetic (RF) · Photonic (EO/IR) · Acoustic
Azimuth coverage360° continuous, all layers
Track handlingSimultaneous multi-track, one fused track file per aircraft
Swarm handlingFull-sky simultaneous hold with threat-value prioritisation
Engagement modesManual / Assisted / Full Autonomous (ROE-gated, geofenced)
Cue-to-fire readinessUnder 2 seconds
Network topologySingle node or meshed multi-node
Autonomous enduranceUp to 24 hours

LAYER 01 · TERAWAVE (RF)

Detection envelope2–3 km nominal
Operating modeFully passive · zero emission
Localisation methodCoherent direction finding — phase-preserving receive chain
Signal classificationField-updatable emitter library (commercial, modified, military)
Protocol handlingCommand uplink, video downlink, telemetry, frequency hopping
Operator localisationYes — ground control station bearing-fixed separately
OutputSlew-to-cue sector to Layer 02

LAYER 02 · SLEUTHOUND (EO/IR)

Detection envelope1.5 km nominal
Spectral bandsNIR · SWIR · MWIR, pixel-level fused
Scan patternContinuous rotation, full hemispherical coverage
Refresh rate1 Hz full-sky
ProcessingOn-board GPU inference at the sensor head
Classification outputRotary-wing UAS / fixed-wing UAS / bird / manned aircraft
RF dependencyNone — detects radio-silent and fibre-optic drones

LAYER 03 · BAT-M (ACOUSTIC)

Localisation band800 m – 100 m
SensorCalibrated three-dimensional microphone array
Detection principleRotor blade-pass harmonic extraction via DSP
Solution typeReal-time bearing from differential wavefront arrival
HeritageGridbots BAT acoustic gunshot locator family
EW vulnerabilityNone — non-electromagnetic domain
RoleTerminal confirmation inside the weapon envelope

EFFECTOR · KATANA RCWS

Weapon fit7.62 mm medium machine gun (air-defence configuration)
Engagement envelope1 km
Burst discipline4–5 rounds per engagement, then assess
Own sensorIndependent real-time EO/IR tracker
Stabilisation3-axis — shoot-on-the-move capable
Fire controlContinuous lead-compensated ballistic solver
Azimuth traverse360°
Re-engagementSub-second re-slew to next prioritised track
AssessmentAutomatic EO/IR battle damage assessment and re-cue

DEPLOYMENT, MOUNT & ENVIRONMENT

ConfigurationSingle compact mast — sensors, compute and power conditioning
Deployment time15–20 minutes
Crew requirementTwo persons
CalibrationAutomatic at boot — levelling, alignment and self-health check
Sensor servicingField hot-swap, bolt-and-connector
Effector placementCo-sited or remote node
Vehicle mountLight 4×4 through heavy truck chassis
EnclosureSealed, wide-temperature operation, high-humidity tolerance
MechanicalMIL-STD vibration and shock envelopes, anti-vibration isolation
ElectricalEMI/EMC conformant, fused redundant power architecture

Detailed performance figures, environmental qualification reports and interface control documents are released to qualified government and defence procurement authorities on request.

§ 11 · Compliance & Procurement

DEPLOY SENTINEL

Indigenous design · Indigenous manufacture · Indigenous support

INDIGENISATION & SOVEREIGNTY

Gridbots Sentinel is designed, developed and manufactured in India. Every layer of the sensing stack, the fusion core and the KATANA effector originate from a domestic engineering base, under Make-in-India and Atmanirbhar Bharat defence-procurement directives.

This is not a labelling exercise. Domestic origin removes import licensing exposure, foreign technology-transfer restriction, currency risk and end-use veto from the programme entirely. Depot-level maintenance, spares and software sustainment all reside within India, and the source engineering team is reachable directly rather than through a foreign principal.

For large-scale procurement, Gridbots offers structured technology-transfer arrangements — design documentation, manufacturing process, test jigs and engineer training — supporting partner co-production and long-term self-reliance.

Engagement Options

Request for quotation
Detailed technical briefing
Live field demonstration
Site-specific threat assessment
Custom integration study
Technology transfer discussion

Related Platforms

KATANA — AI-enabled remote weapon station
SLEUTHOUND-STAB — FOG-stabilised EO payload platform
BAT — acoustic gunshot locator
ZEUS · TITAN — combat UGV family
Procurement & Technical

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

A fibre-optic tethered FPV emits nothing, so the RF layer is blind to it by design — and that single threat class defeats RF-only counter-drone systems outright. Sentinel does not depend on RF. The Sleuthound optical head sweeps the full hemisphere once per second in NIR, SWIR and MWIR, and the BAT-M acoustic array reads the rotor blade-pass harmonic inside 800 metres. Both layers carry the full engagement independently of any radio emission.
Radar radiates, which lets an adversary detect, geolocate and home on the site — a decisive disadvantage in a contested electromagnetic environment. Radar is also defeated by terrain masking, clutter and nap-of-the-earth approach at low altitude. Sentinel's outer two layers are fully passive and emit nothing, and its physics diversity across the electromagnetic, photonic and acoustic domains removes the single point of failure a radar-first architecture carries.
Jamming acts only inside the electromagnetic spectrum. The optical and acoustic layers lie outside it entirely, so a jammer-carrying UAS degrades the RF layer while Sleuthound and BAT-M continue to track and confirm. Classification, fusion and cueing all execute on-mast, so a comms-denied node continues to detect, decide and — within its authorised rule set — engage without a round trip to a rear headquarters.
The 1 Hz full-sky optical scan holds every contact in the volume simultaneously rather than searching sector by sector, so saturation from multiple vectors does not create blind arcs. The fusion core maintains one track file per aircraft and the prioritisation engine sequences KATANA by threat value. KATANA fires a controlled four to five round burst, assesses, then re-slews to the next-highest-threat track in under a second — sustaining a high engagement rate on a modest ammunition load.
Classification is multispectral and cross-domain. NIR resolves airframe geometry and rotor form, MWIR reads motor and battery thermal signature, SWIR maintains the picture through haze and twilight, and the acoustic layer independently confirms a rotor harmonic that birds do not produce. The corroboration state — which domains hold the track and with what agreement — is shown with every contact, so declaration rests on visible evidence rather than an opaque confidence percentage.
In Manual and Assisted modes, yes — the operator authorises every kinetic effect, with a dual-confirmation workflow in Manual. Full Autonomous mode is reserved for saturation scenarios in which threat tempo exceeds the human decision loop, and it operates only within a pre-authorised rule set and a geofenced engagement volume. Operator override is available at all times, and every engagement is logged in full: corroboration state, authorising operator, firing solution, before-and-after imagery and grid coordinates.
Two persons bring the system into operation in 15 to 20 minutes. The complete sensing stack is a single mast that erects, levels and self-calibrates automatically at boot. Individual sensors are field hot-swappable as a bolt-and-connector operation rather than a depot task, and KATANA can be co-sited or placed on a separate node since the cue is data, not a mechanical linkage.
Yes. Sentinel is designed as a sensor and effector node inside a larger air-defence picture. Fused track data, engagement logs, classification imagery and system health telemetry publish over standard military datalinks to any compatible C2 node. Custom integration studies are available for bespoke C2 environments, and the system remains fully operational if the link drops.
Yes. Every sensing layer, the fusion core and the KATANA effector are designed, developed and manufactured in India under Make-in-India and Atmanirbhar Bharat defence procurement directives. Domestic origin removes import licensing exposure, technology-transfer restriction, currency risk and end-use veto. Depot-level maintenance, spares and software sustainment reside within India, and structured technology-transfer arrangements are available for large-scale procurement.

Standards & Certification

EMI / EMC Conformant MIL-STD Vibration & Shock Sealed Enclosures Wide-Temperature Operation High-Humidity Tolerance Fused Redundant Power Make in India Atmanirbhar Bharat · PIL

SECURE YOUR AIRSPACE

Engage the Gridbots defence solutions team for a technical briefing, a live-fire field demonstration, or a procurement discussion. Site-specific threat assessments and custom integration studies are available on request to qualified government and defence procurement authorities.

GET A QUOTE CONTACT US

Gridbots Technologies Pvt. Ltd. · Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
+91-9924826584 · contact@gridbots.com

Document referenceDOC-GBS-SENT-002ClassificationTechnical briefing
Revision2026.Q3 · Issue 05DistributionAuthorised defence review
Product designationGRIDBOTS SENTINELLanguageEN · translations available